{"id":7822,"date":"2026-04-07T16:02:44","date_gmt":"2026-04-07T08:02:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/2026\/04\/07\/conditions-given-rise-to-the-collapse-of-neoliberalism-have-not-changed-an-interview-with-alex-william\/"},"modified":"2026-04-07T16:43:18","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T08:43:18","slug":"conditions-given-rise-to-the-collapse-of-neoliberalism-have-not-changed-an-interview-with-alex-william","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2026\/04\/07\/conditions-given-rise-to-the-collapse-of-neoliberalism-have-not-changed-an-interview-with-alex-william\/","title":{"rendered":"Conditions Given Rise to the Collapse of Neoliberalism Have Not Changed\u2014An Interview with Alex William"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Editor\u2019s Note: In 2015, <a href=\"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/inventing-the-future-postcapitalism-and-a-world-without-work\/\"><em>Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work<\/em><\/a> sparked wide-ranging debate within left-wing intellectual circles in Europe and North America. The book proposed automation, reduced working hours, and universal basic income as pathways for breaking out of the neoliberal framework and reopening the horizon of the future.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A decade on, artificial intelligence has advanced rapidly, global political and economic orders remain in flux, and the relationships between labour, technology, and the state have grown ever more complex. The publication of the Chinese-language edition now brings the book into a political and social context markedly different from that of its original emergence.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On this occasion, we invited one of the book\u2019s authors, Alex Williams, for an interview to reflect on the book\u2019s place within Western intellectual debates and to consider what new questions, controversies, and possibilities might arise as the ideas of post-work and postcapitalism enter the Chinese-speaking world<em><em>.<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Since <em><em>Inventing the Future <\/em><\/em>was published, technological and socioeconomic conditions have shifted dramatically\u2014from the consolidation of platform capitalism and rapid advances in AI to major changes in the global political landscape. How do you assess these developments today? Do you think they have brought us any closer to the possibility of postcapitalism and a \u201cworld without work,\u201d or have they instead pushed that horizon further away?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The transformations in global politics, technology, and society seem to reframe the argument of the book in two ways. On the one hand, they serve to confirm some of its core theses: that technology must be attended to as a key logic of power, that artificial intelligence was going to become a world changing technology, and that the tensions within global neoliberalism were never going to be sustainable in the long-term. On the other hand, these developments have not been accompanied by an obvious shift towards either a successful leftist politics (certainly not in America, China, or Europe).<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yet the core idea of the book was not that technological development alone would usher in an age of less work, instead it sets out that technological change must be accompanied by the development of political forces that can guide that technology in ways that force the future we want to come to pass. The structural shifts we have seen have in no way invalidated the thesis of the book, in many ways they simply reassert its necessity.<\/p>\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>At a time when pandemics, war, and economic instability seem to have become permanent features of everyday life, does the idea of a post\u2011work society still function as a politically mobilising imaginary? Looking back, are there elements of your critique of work\u2014or the alternatives proposed in the book\u2014that you would now want to revise, refine, or expand?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Very clearly, the analysis the book presents is incomplete. In choosing to focus on one particular political imaginary, the post-work future, it necessarily ignores many other significant problems and opportunities in the contemporary world.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of these is the environmental crisis, which was considered at the time of writing but excised, largely for reasons of space. I also think that there should have been significantly more emphasis on the problem of capital itself, and the need to directly confront it.<\/p>\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>One of the most striking parts of the book is your analysis of the Mont P\u00e8lerin Society, particularly its commitment to a long\u2011term project of hegemonic formation through expertise, institutions, and public discourse. In today\u2019s media environment\u2014marked by declining trust in legacy media, algorithmic attention economies, and the dominance of outrage and rage\u2011bait\u2014do you still see space for a similar long game for leftist ideas? If so, what might such a strategy look like today?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The only game is a long-term one, unfortunately, though one which is able to take up the opportunities offered by the contingent and the immediate. The notion that some \u2018short cut\u2019 exists to get to an advanced socialism is highly dubious. Take for example the global neo-fascist right. They were able to execute a flexible plan to overtake institutions, media, the online environment, and so on, through innovative means. They have proven to be massively successful, even if only at capturing states throughout the world in the years since 2016. One of their leading thinkers and strategists, Steve Bannon, explicitly takes a Gramscian view on the mechanics of power, that politics is downstream from culture. Hence the new right\u2019s obsession with culture wars and issues that seem on their face to be ridiculous or silly. For me, this has demonstrated the continued necessity of a hegemonic framework for any leftist strategy.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What such a strategy would look like today in specifics is less certain. In many respects, a lot would depend on the specific context in which it is being developed, the national or regional conditions and constraints involved in the particular situation. But the conditions which have given rise to the collapse of neoliberalism have not changed or improved. In many senses, the global political situation is more perilous, and even less able to provide ordinary people with material abundance than ever. It is with a concrete analysis of the interests of the people, in particular of those interests that are denied under the present system, that any strategy must begin.<\/p>\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Much of <em><em>Inventing the Future<\/em><\/em> is shaped by European political experience. In many parts of Asia, however, long working hours, intense competition, and tightly constrained political conditions are the norm. Do these contexts pose distinct structural challenges for post\u2011capitalist or post\u2011work thinking? How might alternative futures need to be imagined differently in response to these conditions?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Every politics must always be refined in terms of the conditions that actually pertain in a given place and time. But in many ways, one could argue that the South East Asian political situation is significantly more ripe for a post-work politics than Europe or America. The rise of such social forms as the Chinese \u2018lying flat\u2019 and anti-work ideology demonstrate the organic nature of the reaction to such hyper-competitive and exploitative systems of labour. But these incipient notions require formation and political expression, strategy and ideology. Clearly such dynamics as expansionist AI technologies reducing employment opportunities, or environmental crises threatening the reduction in habitable space on the planet could lead to opportunities for a post-work socialist politics.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But such opportunities need strategic intentionality to turn them from freely circulating currents into a coherent political force. And in every case, much will also depend on the structural conditions of politics in a given nation. How could the \u2018productivism\u2019 of the Chinese state be converted towards a national anti-work politics? Would this even be possible within the structures of the Party form? It seems to my eyes as an outsider that at present this looks highly unlikely. Yet is this less likely than Deng\u2019s dramatic reforms of the economy in the 1980s?<\/p>\n\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>With the publication of a Chinese\u2011language edition of<em><em> Inventing the Future<\/em><\/em>, the book enters social and political contexts quite different from those in which it was originally written. How do you imagine it might be read in these settings? Are there particular debates, tensions, or new questions you would hope this encounter might open up?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This encounter between the book and the Chinese political situation is one which excites me. I would be hopeful that questions could run in both directions \u2013 both towards the European left and towards the Chinese one. Such questions become increasingly key as the hegemony of the United States on global economic and political affairs appears to slip more and more into difficulties itself. In some senses, the book\u2019s critical half at this point is more of historical interest, in terms of the history of the western radical left in the 2010s. I think the prospective half will be of greater interest for readers in a Chinese context.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In particular, I think the most important question is of how to control technological development for the benefit of the people. This has a very different character within the setting of China, where the state has for some time now taken a much more \u2018active\u2019 role in guiding the development of technology than elsewhere in the world. This has included the kind of \u2018disciplining\u2019 of technology sector oligarchs that would be very welcome in the United States. The country has also spread its investment bets rather more broadly than the global North countries, looking not just to AI but also green energy technologies amongst others, and this will also inevitably create different pressures and incentives. Finally, there is the unique nature of the Chinese state, and its relationships to both capitalism and socialism. How does a post-work politics fare under these conditions, is it possible, and what new strategies and forms should it take?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Editor\u2019s Note: In 2015, Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work sparked wide-ranging debate within left-wing intellectual circles in Europe and North America. The book proposed automation, reduced working hours, and universal basic income as pathways for breaking out of the neoliberal framework and reopening the horizon of the future. A decade on, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145170531,"featured_media":7000,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_coblocks_attr":"","_coblocks_dimensions":"","_coblocks_responsive_height":"","_coblocks_accordion_ie_support":"","_crdt_document":"","advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[776957927],"tags":[776958274,776958012],"class_list":["post-7822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-notebook-en","tag-inventing-the-future","tag-notebook-en"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pai6UY-22a","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":7075,"url":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2025\/09\/18\/my-suggestion-is-desertion-good-life-will-be-possible-only-in-islands-of-autonomy-from-history-%e2%94%80%e2%94%80an-interview-with-franco-bifo-berardi\/","url_meta":{"origin":7822,"position":0},"title":"&#8220;My suggestion is: desertion. Good life will be possible only in islands of autonomy from History.&#8221;\u2500\u2500An Interview with Franco &#8216;Bifo&#8217; Berardi","author":"\u624b\u6c11\u51fa\u7248\u793e","date":"18\/09\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"On the occasion of the publication of the Chinese translation of The Second Coming, Typesetter Publishing invited Berardi to share his thoughts and insights on the latest developments in the global socioolitical situation.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Notebook&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Notebook","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/category\/notebook-en\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7030,"url":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2022\/10\/10\/is-it-possible-to-break-monopolies-and-privatisation-on-public-platforms-an-interview-with-platform-capitalism-author-nick-srnicek\/","url_meta":{"origin":7822,"position":1},"title":"Is it Possible to Break Monopolies and Privatisation on Public Platforms? \u2013 An Interview with Platform Capitalism Author Nick Srnicek","author":"\u624b\u6c11\u51fa\u7248\u793e","date":"10\/10\/2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Nick Srnicek\u2019s predictions in the book have come true. The translator conducted a special transcontinental interview with the author to explore his reinterpretation of \"platform capitalism\" in the post-pandemic era and his vision of public platforms.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Notebook&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Notebook","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/category\/notebook-en\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7253,"url":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2025\/10\/23\/the-failed-hong-kong-protest-of-summer-1986-an-interview-with-marcus-yee\/","url_meta":{"origin":7822,"position":2},"title":"The \u201cFailed\u201d Hong Kong Protest of Summer 1986: An Interview with Marcus Yee","author":"\u624b\u6c11\u51fa\u7248\u793e","date":"23\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Editor's note: In the summer of 1986, Hong Kong witnessed a groundbreaking protest that combined global and local mobilisation\u2014the movement against the Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant. With over one million signatures in support and 116 groups forming a cross-sector alliance encompassing trade unions, neighbourhood groups, environmental organisations, and district\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Notebook&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Notebook","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/category\/notebook-en\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7641,"url":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2026\/03\/09\/planning-culture-in-a-city-of-scarcity-an-interview-with-melody-yiu\/","url_meta":{"origin":7822,"position":3},"title":"Planning Culture in a City of Scarcity\u2014An Interview with Melody Yiu","author":"\u624b\u6c11\u51fa\u7248\u793e","date":"09\/03\/2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Editor\u2019s Note: In Hong Kong, where land is measured in square feet and futures are habitually justified in economic terms, culture has often been treated as an accessory\u2014desirable, perhaps, but dispensable when space or profitability is at stake. Yet the city\u2019s theatres, museums, and civic cultural spaces have never been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Notebook&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Notebook","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/category\/notebook-en\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/webpost-profile.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6713,"url":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2025\/08\/18\/editors-words-returning-to-68-is-the-only-way-to-truly-understand-the-contemporary-cultural-and-political-impasse\/","url_meta":{"origin":7822,"position":4},"title":"[Editor&#8217;s Words] Returning to &#8217;68 is the only way to truly understand the contemporary cultural and political impasse","author":"\u624b\u6c11\u51fa\u7248\u793e","date":"18\/08\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In his book \"The Second Coming,\" Bifo begins his discussion by returning to '68. He even goes so far as to say \"In cultural and political terms these fifty years [from 1968 to now] look like a geological era.\" Bifo makes this claim because, viewed from cultural and political perspectives,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hong Kong Studies Newsroom&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hong Kong Studies Newsroom","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/category\/%e9%a6%99%e6%b8%af%e5%ad%b8%e8%a1%93%e6%83%85%e5%a0%b1%e5%ae%a4-en\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/editorswords.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/editorswords.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/editorswords.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/editorswords.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/editorswords.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7242,"url":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/2025\/10\/20\/spotlight-ireland-provided-a-basic-income-to-2000-selected-artists\/","url_meta":{"origin":7822,"position":5},"title":"[Spotlight] Ireland provided a basic income to 2,000 selected artists","author":"\u624b\u6c11\u51fa\u7248\u793e","date":"20\/10\/2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The art world has been abuzz with discussions about a groundbreaking policy in Ireland: starting in 2026, Ireland will provide a basic income to 2,000 selected artists, offering each of them approximately HK$2,900 per week or HK$11,600 per month. This initiative traces back to 2022 when the Irish government introduced\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Hong Kong Studies Newsroom&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Hong Kong Studies Newsroom","link":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/category\/%e9%a6%99%e6%b8%af%e5%ad%b8%e8%a1%93%e6%83%85%e5%a0%b1%e5%ae%a4-en\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/spotlight.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/spotlight.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/spotlight.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/spotlight.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/typesetter.hk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/spotlight.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145170531"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7822"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7845,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7822\/revisions\/7845"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7000"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/typesetter.hk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}